Microlensing towards the SMC: a new analysis of OGLE and EROS results
S. Calchi Novati (1,2,3), S. Mirzoyan (2,3), Ph. Jetzer (2), G., Scarpetta (1,3,4) ((1) IIASS, Vietri sul Mare, (2) ITP, Zurich, (3) Univ., Salerno, (4) INFN, Napoli)

TL;DR
This paper reanalyzes microlensing data towards the SMC from EROS and OGLE campaigns, assessing whether events are due to known stellar populations or dark matter MACHOs, and sets upper limits on MACHO contribution.
Contribution
It provides a new statistical analysis distinguishing self-lensing from MACHO lensing and constrains dark matter halo composition using recent microlensing data.
Findings
Self-lensing can explain the number of observed events.
Some events' characteristics suggest non-self lensing origins.
Upper limits on MACHO halo fraction are about 10% for 0.01 M_sun MACHOs.
Abstract
We present a new analysis of the results of the EROS-2, OGLE-II, and OGLE-III microlensing campaigns towards the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). Through a statistical analysis we address the issue of the \emph{nature} of the reported microlensing candidate events, whether to be attributed to lenses belonging to known population (the SMC luminous components or the Milky Way disc, to which we broadly refer to as "self lensing") or to the would be population of dark matter compact halo objects (MACHOs). To this purpose, we present profiles of the optical depth and, comparing to the observed quantities, we carry out analyses of the events position and duration. Finally, we evaluate and study the microlensing rate. Overall, we consider five reported microlensing events towards the SMC (one by EROS and four by OGLE). The analysis shows that in terms of number of events the expected self lensing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
