Acyclic, connected and tree sets
Valerie Berth\'e, Clelia De Felice, Francesco Dolce, Julien, Leroy, Dominique Perrin, Christophe Reutenauer, Giuseppina Rindone

TL;DR
This paper explores special classes of word sets characterized by properties of their extension graphs, establishing connections with free groups and subgroup bases, with implications for combinatorics on words.
Contribution
It characterizes acyclic and tree sets of words via extension graph properties and links first return words to free group bases in uniformly recurrent tree sets.
Findings
In uniformly recurrent tree sets, first return words form free group bases.
A set is acyclic if and only if all included bifix codes are subgroup bases.
Provides a characterization of acyclic, connected, and tree sets through extension graph properties.
Abstract
Given a set of words, one associates to each word in an undirected graph, called its extension graph, and which describes the possible extensions of on the left and on the right. We investigate the family of sets of words defined by the property of the extension graph of each word in the set to be acyclic or connected or a tree. We prove that in a uniformly recurrent tree set, the sets of first return words are bases of the free group on the alphabet. Concerning acyclic sets, we prove as a main result that a set is acyclic if and only if any bifix code included in is a basis of the subgroup that it generates.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
