The Bolocam Galactic Plane Survey. X. A Complete Spectroscopic Catalog of Dense Molecular Gas Observed toward 1.1 mm Dust Continuum Sources with 7.5 <= l <= 194 degrees
Yancy L. Shirley (Arizona), Timothy P. Ellsworth-Bowers (Colorado),, Brian Svoboda (Arizona), Wayne M. Schlingman (Colorado), Adam Ginsburg, (Colorado), Erik Rosolowsky (Edmonton), Thomas Gerner (MPIA), Steven Mairs, (Victoria), Cara Battersby (Colorado)

TL;DR
This study presents the largest spectroscopic survey of dense molecular gas in the Milky Way, analyzing over 6000 sources to understand their properties and correlations with dust emission, revealing insights into turbulence and excitation conditions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive spectroscopic catalog of dense gas tracers for all BGPS sources in a large Galactic region, with detailed analysis of their physical and excitation properties.
Findings
Half of the sources have unique velocities identified.
HCO+ is mostly sub-thermally populated and optically thick.
Strong correlations exist between molecular emission and dust continuum flux.
Abstract
The Bolocam Galactic Plane Survey (BGPS) is a 1.1 mm continuum survey of dense clumps of dust throughout the Galaxy covering 170 square degrees. We present spectroscopic observations using the Heinrich Hertz Submillimeter Telescope of the dense gas tracers, HCO+ and N2H+ 3-2, for all 6194 sources in the Bolocam Galactic Plane Survey v1.0.1 catalog between 7.5 <= l <= 194 degrees. This is the largest targeted spectroscopic survey of dense molecular gas in the Milky Way to date. We find unique velocities for 3126 (50.5%) of the BGPS v1.0.1 sources observed. Strong N2H+ 3-2 emission (T_{mb} > 0.5 K) without HCO+ 3-2 emission does not occur in this catalog. We characterize the properties of the dense molecular gas emission toward the entire sample. HCO+ is very sub-thermally populated and the 3-2 transitions are optically thick toward most BGPS clumps. The median observed line width is 3.3…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
