A-optimal design of experiments for infinite-dimensional Bayesian linear inverse problems with regularized $\ell_0$-sparsification
Alen Alexanderian, Noemi Petra, Georg Stadler, Omar Ghattas

TL;DR
This paper introduces an efficient approach for designing optimal sensor placements in infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs, reducing computational costs and achieving sparse, high-quality sensor configurations.
Contribution
The authors develop a low-rank approximation and randomized trace estimator for efficient A-optimal design, incorporating an $ ext{l}_0$-sparsification technique for binary sensor placement in PDE-based inverse problems.
Findings
Optimal design computation cost is independent of parameter and sensor dimensions.
$ ext{l}_0$-sparsified designs outperform $ ext{l}_1$-sparsified ones.
Method effectively reduces PDE solves in high-dimensional inverse problems.
Abstract
We present an efficient method for computing A-optimal experimental designs for infinite-dimensional Bayesian linear inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs). Specifically, we address the problem of optimizing the location of sensors (at which observational data are collected) to minimize the uncertainty in the parameters estimated by solving the inverse problem, where the uncertainty is expressed by the trace of the posterior covariance. Computing optimal experimental designs (OEDs) is particularly challenging for inverse problems governed by computationally expensive PDE models with infinite-dimensional (or, after discretization, high-dimensional) parameters. To alleviate the computational cost, we exploit the problem structure and build a low-rank approximation of the parameter-to-observable map, preconditioned with the square root of the prior covariance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
