Relativistic corrections to the pair double heavy diquark production in e^+e^- annihilation
A.P. Martynenko (Samara State U & Samara State Aerospace U.), A.M., Trunin (Samara State Aerospace U.)

TL;DR
This paper calculates relativistic and bound state corrections to the production of double heavy diquark pairs in e+e- annihilation, showing significant effects on cross sections and estimating baryon yields at B-factories.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive relativistic correction framework for diquark production in e+e- collisions, combining perturbative QCD with a relativistic quark model.
Findings
Relativistic effects significantly alter nonrelativistic cross section predictions.
The model provides estimates for double heavy baryon yields at B-factories.
Relativistic corrections improve the accuracy of diquark production calculations.
Abstract
On the basis of perturbative QCD and relativistic quark model we calculate relativistic and bound state corrections in the production processes of a pair of double heavy diquarks. Relativistic factors in the production amplitude connected with the relative motion of heavy quarks and the transformation law of the bound state wave function to the reference frame of the moving diquark S-wave bound states are taken into account. For the gluon and quark propagators entering the production vertex function we use a truncated expansion in the ratio of the relative quark momenta to the center-of-mass energy s up to the second order. Relativistic corrections to the quark-quark bound state wave functions in the rest frame are considered by means of the Breit-like potential. It turns out that examined effects change essentially nonrelativistic results of the cross sections. The estimate of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
