Remarks on criteria for achieving the optimal diversity-multiplexing gain trade-off
Roope Vehkalahti

TL;DR
This paper challenges the sufficiency of the non-vanishing determinant criterion for optimal DMT in asymmetric STBCs, contrasting recent findings and translating universality criteria into lattice theory with new conjectures.
Contribution
It demonstrates that NVD alone does not guarantee optimal DMT, and reformulates the universality criterion in lattice theory, proposing new conjectures.
Findings
NVD criterion is insufficient for asymmetric STBCs to achieve optimal DMT
Reformulation of universality criterion in lattice theory context
Proposes conjectures to clarify the criteria for optimal DMT
Abstract
In this short note we will prove that non-vanishing determinant (NVD) criterion is not enough for an asymmetric space-time block code (STBC) to achieve the optimal diversity-multiplexing gain trade-off (DMT). This result is in contrast to the recent result made by Srinath and Rajan. In order to clarify the issue further the approximately universality criterion by Tavildar and Viswanath is translated into language of lattice theory and some conjectures are given.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques · Coding theory and cryptography · Error Correcting Code Techniques
