Oersted Lecture 2013: How should we think about how our students think?
Edward F. Redish

TL;DR
This paper discusses a theoretical framework called the Resources Framework to better understand how students think and learn physics, integrating insights from neuroscience, psychology, and linguistics to improve teaching strategies.
Contribution
It introduces the Resources Framework as a new approach to modeling physics learning and demonstrates its application through epistemological framing and classroom data.
Findings
Resources Framework provides a new phenomenology of physics learning.
Epistemological framing influences students' approach to tasks.
Classroom data shows how perceptions of knowledge affect learning.
Abstract
Physics Education Research (PER) applies a scientific approach to the question, "How do our students think about and learn physics?" PER allows us to explore such intellectually engaging questions as, "What does it mean to understand something in physics?" and, "What skills and competencies do we want our students to learn from our physics classes?" To address questions like these, we need to do more than observe student difficulties and build curricula. We need a theoretical framework -- a structure for talking about, making sense of, and modeling how one thinks about, learns, and understands physics. In this paper, I outline some aspects of the Resources Framework, a structure that some of us are using to create a phenomenology of physics learning that ties closely to modern developments in neuroscience, psychology, and linguistics. As an example of how this framework gives new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
