New determination of double-beta-decay properties in 48Ca: high-precision Q-value measurement and improved nuclear matrix element calculations
A. A. Kwiatkowski, T. Brunner, J. D. Holt, A. Chaudhuri, U. Chowdhury,, M. Eibach, J. Engel, A. T. Gallant, A. Grossheim, M. Horoi, A. Lennarz, T. D., Macdonald, M. R. Pearson, B. E. Schultz, M. C. Simon, R.A. Senkov, V. V., Simon, K. Zuber, J. Dilling

TL;DR
This paper presents a precise measurement of the Q-value for 48Ca double-beta decay and introduces an improved nuclear matrix element calculation, enhancing the understanding of this decay process.
Contribution
The study provides the first high-precision Q-value measurement for 48Ca and develops an advanced shell-model calculation for the nuclear matrix element, incorporating second-order many-body perturbation theory.
Findings
Q-value measured as 4267.98(32) keV
Nuclear matrix element increased by about 75% with the new calculation
Results support the feasibility of 48Ca double-beta-decay experiments
Abstract
We report a direct measurement of the Q-value of the neutrinoless double-beta-decay candidate 48Ca at the TITAN Penning-trap mass spectrometer, with the result that Q = 4267.98(32) keV. We measured the masses of both the mother and daughter nuclides, and in the latter case found a 1 keV deviation from the literature value. In addition to the Q-value, we also present results of a new calculation of the neutrinoless double-beta-decay nuclear matrix element of 48Ca. Using diagrammatic many-body perturbation theory to second order to account for physics outside the valence space, we constructed an effective shell-model double-beta-decay operator, which increased the nuclear matrix element by about 75% compared with that produced by the bare operator. The new Q-value and matrix element strengthen the case for a 48Ca double-beta-decay experiment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
