Comparative analysis of direct and "step-by-step" Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation methods
Alexander J. Silenko

TL;DR
This paper compares direct and step-by-step Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation methods, highlighting their differences in higher-order terms and analyzing their applicability boundaries.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of transformation methods, revealing discrepancies at higher orders and clarifying their respective applicability limits.
Findings
Step-by-step methods differ from the exact Eriksen method at higher orders.
Methods agree at zeroth and first orders but diverge thereafter.
The paper establishes boundaries for the applicability of each method.
Abstract
Relativistic methods for the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation of the ``step-by-step'' type already at the first step give an expression for the Hamilton operator not coinciding with the exact result determined by the Eriksen method. The methods agree for the zeroth and first orders in the Planck constant terms but do not agree for the second and higher-order terms. We analyze the benefits and drawbacks of various methods and establish their applicability boundaries.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
