Semi-implicit Euler schemes for ordinary differential inclusions
Janosch Rieger

TL;DR
This paper introduces and analyzes two semi-implicit Euler schemes for differential inclusions, demonstrating improved stability, robustness, and computational efficiency over traditional implicit Euler methods.
Contribution
The paper proposes two semi-implicit Euler schemes for differential inclusions, providing detailed error analysis and showing advantages over implicit schemes in stability and robustness.
Findings
Semi-implicit schemes inherit favorable stability properties.
Performance surpasses implicit Euler scheme in efficiency.
Schemes are more robust to spatial discretization.
Abstract
Two semi-implicit Euler schemes for differential inclusions are proposed and analyzed in depth. An error analysis shows that both semi-implicit schemes inherit favorable stability properties from the differential inclusion. Their performance is considerably better than that of the implicit Euler scheme, because instead of implicit inclusions only implicit equations have to be solved for computing their images. In addition, they are more robust with respect to spatial discretization than the implicit Euler scheme.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics · Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering · Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
