Chemical Freeze-out of Strange Particles and Possible Root of Strangeness Suppression
K. A. Bugaev, D. R. Oliinychenko, J. Cleymans, A. I. Ivanytskyi, I. N., Mishustin, E. G. Nikonov, V. V. Sagun

TL;DR
This paper compares two methods for modeling the chemical freeze-out of strange particles in heavy-ion collisions, finding that a fully equilibrated approach better explains experimental data, especially for hyperons.
Contribution
It introduces an alternative fully equilibrated model for strange particle freeze-out based on conservation laws, improving data description over traditional non-equilibrium models.
Findings
The fully equilibrated approach describes hadron multiplicities with /dof = 1.06.
Conventional models show strangeness enhancement at low energies, contrary to suppression.
Fully equilibrated models better fit hyperon and antihyperon data.
Abstract
Two approaches to treat the chemical freeze-out of strange particles in hadron resonance gas model are analyzed. The first one employs their non-equillibration via the usual \gamma_s factor and such a model describes the hadron multiplicities measured in nucleus-nucleus collisions at AGS, SPS and RHIC energies with \chi^2/dof = 1.15. Surprisingly, at low energies we find not the strangeness suppression, but its enhancement. Also we suggest an alternative approach to treat the strange particle freeze-out separately, but with the full chemical equilibration. This approach is based on the conservation laws which allow us to connect the freeze-outs of strange and non-strange hadrons. Within the suggested approach the same set of hadron multiplicities can be described better than within the conventional approach with \chi^2/dof = 1.06. Remarkably, the fully equilibrated approach describes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
