Undecidability of MM-QFAs Language Equivalence Problem
Tianrong Lin

TL;DR
This paper proves that determining whether two measure many quantum finite automata recognize the same language is undecidable, highlighting fundamental limits in quantum automata theory.
Contribution
It establishes the undecidability of language equivalence for MM-QFA and EQFA, providing new proofs and deriving related properties from these results.
Findings
Language equivalence is undecidable for MM-QFA and EQFA.
Undecidability of emptiness for MM-QFA and EQFA is proven.
Reductions from emptiness to equivalence problems are demonstrated.
Abstract
Let and be the languages recognized by {\em measure many 1-way quantum finite automata (MM-QFA)} (or,{\em enhanced 1-way quantum finite automata(EQFA)}) with strict and non-strict cut-point , respectively. We consider the language equivalence problem and show the following 1. both strict and non-strict language equivalence are undecidable; 2. we provide an another proof of the undecidability of non-strict and strict emptiness of MM-QFA and EQFA, and then reducing the language equivalence problem to emptiness problem; 3. lastly, we obtain some other properties which can be derived from the above results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Machine Learning and Algorithms · DNA and Biological Computing
