Reactivity Boundaries to Separate the Fate of a Chemical Reaction Associated with Multiple Saddles
Yutaka Nagahata, Hiroshi Teramoto, Chun-Biu Li, Shinnosuke Kawai, and, Tamiki Komatsuzaki

TL;DR
This paper generalizes the concept of reactivity boundaries to complex reaction pathways involving multiple saddle points, demonstrating their existence and utility in understanding reaction mechanisms beyond simple index-one saddle cases.
Contribution
It introduces a broader definition of reactivity boundaries applicable to reactions with higher index saddles and multiple saddle points, supported by numerical analysis of a proton exchange in H+5.
Findings
Reactivity boundaries exist even in complex saddle configurations.
Reactivity boundaries can predict effective initial conditions for reactions.
The method reveals detailed reaction mechanisms in multi-saddle systems.
Abstract
Reactivity boundaries that divide the origin and destination of trajectories are crucial of importance to reveal the mechanism of reactions, which was recently found to exist robustly even at high energies for index-one saddles [Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 048304 (2010)]. Here we revisit the concept of the reactivity boundary and propose a more general definition that can involve a single reaction associated with a bottleneck made up of higher index saddles and/or several saddle points with different indices, where the normal form theory, based on expansion around a single stationary point, does not work. We numerically demonstrate the reactivity boundary by using a reduced model system of the cation where the proton exchange reaction takes place through a bottleneck made up of two index-two saddle points and two index-one saddle points. The cross section of the reactivity boundary in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
