Quantum confinement in perovskite oxide heterostructures: tight binding instead of nearly free electron picture
Zhicheng Zhong, Qinfang Zhang, and Karsten Held

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a tight binding model better explains quantum well states in perovskite oxide heterostructures with localized d electrons than the traditional nearly free electron approach.
Contribution
The authors develop simple first-principles tight binding models for perovskite oxide heterostructures, showing improved accuracy over NFE models for localized d-electron systems.
Findings
TB model provides a more reliable description of quantum well states.
Two-parameter TB models match experimental results more closely.
TB approach offers an intuitive physical understanding.
Abstract
Most recently, orbital-selective quantum well states of electrons have been experimentally observed in SrVO ultrathin films [K. Yoshimatsu et. al., Science 333, 319 (2011)] and SrTiO surfaces [A. F. Santander-Syro et. al., Nature 469, 189 (2011)]. Hitherto, one tries to explain these experiments by a nearly free electron (NFE) model, an approach widely used for delocalized electrons in semiconductor heterostructures and simple metal films. We show that a tight binding (TB) model is more suitable for describing heterostructures with more localized electrons. In this paper, we construct from first principles simple TB models for perovskite oxide heterostructures and surfaces. We show that the TB model provides a simple intuitive physical picture and yields, already with only two parameters, quantitatively much more reliable results, consistent with experiment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
