Why is the Conclusion of the GERDA Experiment not Justified ?
Hans Volker Klapdor-Kleingrothaus (Heidelberg, Germany), Irina V., Krivosheina (Heidelberg, Germany, Nishnij Novgorod, Russia)

TL;DR
The GERDA experiment's initial results are inconclusive due to low statistics, higher background levels, and unresolved background lines, making its conclusion on neutrinoless double beta decay unjustified at this stage.
Contribution
This paper critically evaluates the GERDA experiment's first results, highlighting issues with background reduction, energy resolution, and statistical significance compared to previous experiments.
Findings
GERDA's background levels are higher than those of HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW.
GERDA's current half-life limit is lower than the previous experiment.
Further data collection is needed for a justified conclusion.
Abstract
The first results of the GERDA double beta experiment in Gran Sasso were recently presented. They are fully consistent with the Heidelberg-Moscow experiment, but because of its low statistics cannot proof anything at this moment. It is no surprise that the statistics is still far from being able to test the signal claimed by the HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW experiment. The energy resolution of the coaxial detectors is a factor of 1.5 worse than in the HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW experiment. The original goal of background reduction to 10^{-2}counts/kgykeV, or by an order of magnitude compared to the HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW experiment, has not been reached. The background is only a factor 2.3 lower if we refer it to the experimental line width, i.e. in units counts/kgy energy resolution. With pulse shape analysis (PSA) the background in the HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW experiment around Q_{\beta\beta} is 4x10^{-3}…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
