Distinguishing $s^{\pm}$ and $s^{++}$ electron pairing symmetries by neutron spin resonance in superconducting NaFe$_{0.935}$Co$_{0.045}$As
Chenglin Zhang, H.-F. Li, Yu Song, Yixi Su, Guotai Tan, Tucker, Netherton, Caleb Redding, Scott V. Carr, Oleg Sobolev, Astrid Schneidewind,, Enrico Faulhaber, L. W. Harriger, Shiliang Li, Xingye Lu, Daoxin Yao, Tanmoy, Das, A. V. Balatsky, Th. Bruckel, J. W. Lynn

TL;DR
This study uses inelastic neutron scattering to identify a sharp resonance in a superconducting iron pnictide, providing evidence that supports the $s^{ u}$-pairing symmetry over the $s^{++}$ model, thus clarifying the pairing mechanism.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the neutron spin resonance observed in NaFe$_{0.935}$Co$_{0.045}$As supports the $s^{ u}$-pairing symmetry, distinguishing it from the $s^{++}$-pairing symmetry through experimental data and theoretical comparison.
Findings
A sharp neutron spin resonance at 7 meV was observed below $T_c$.
The resonance energy remains nearly constant as temperature approaches $T_c$.
Results are consistent only with the $s^{ u}$-pairing symmetry, not $s^{++}$.
Abstract
A determination of the superconducting (SC) electron pairing symmetry forms the basis for establishing a microscopic mechansim for superconductivity. For iron pnictide superconductors, the -pairing symmetry theory predicts the presence of a sharp neutron spin resonance at an energy below the sum of hole and electron SC gap energies () below . On the other hand, the -pairing symmetry expects a broad spin excitation enhancement at an energy above below . Although the resonance has been observed in iron pnictide superconductors at an energy below consistent with the -pairing symmetry, the mode has also be interpreted as arising from the -pairing symmetry with due to its broad energy width and the large uncertainty in determining the SC gaps. Here we use inelastic neutron scattering to reveal a sharp…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
