CDfdr: A Comparison Density Approach to Local False Discovery Rate Estimation
Subhadeep Mukhopadhyay

TL;DR
This paper introduces a unified approach to local false discovery rate estimation using comparison density, connecting various existing methods under a common framework to enhance understanding and application.
Contribution
It unifies existing local fdr methods through the concept of comparison density, bridging different models under a single theoretical framework.
Findings
Reveals how existing local fdr methods fit into the comparison density framework
Provides a unified notation for false discovery rate estimation methods
Enhances understanding of the relationship between different false discovery approaches
Abstract
Efron et al. (2001) proposed empirical Bayes formulation of the frequentist Benjamini and Hochbergs False Discovery Rate method (Benjamini and Hochberg,1995). This article attempts to unify the `two cultures' using concepts of comparison density and distribution function. We have also shown how almost all of the existing local fdr methods can be viewed as proposing various model specification for comparison density - unifies the vast literature of false discovery methods under one concept and notation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Statistical Methods and Inference
