Most Subsets are Balanced in Finite Groups

TL;DR

In finite groups, most random subsets tend to be balanced with equal sumset and difference set sizes, contrasting with integer subsets where sum-dominated sets are rare, due to the absence of fringes.

Contribution

This paper proves that in large finite groups, the probability of a subset being sum-dominated approaches zero, and most are balanced, highlighting a fundamental difference from integer subsets.

Findings

Probability of sum-dominated sets tends to zero in large finite groups

Most subsets are balanced with equal sumset and difference set sizes

Results for dihedral groups show striking contrast to integer case

Abstract

The sumset is one of the most basic and central objects in additive number theory. Many of the most important problems (such as Goldbach's conjecture and Fermat's Last theorem) can be formulated in terms of the sumset $S + S = \{x+y : x,y\in S\}$ of a set of integers $S$. A finite set of integers $A$ is sum-dominated if $|A+A| > |A-A|$. Though it was believed that the percentage of subsets of $\{0,...,n\}$ that are sum-dominated tends to zero, in 2006 Martin and O'Bryant proved a very small positive percentage are sum-dominated if the sets are chosen uniformly at random (through work of Zhao we know this percentage is approximately $4.5 \cdot 10^{-4}$). While most sets are difference-dominated in the integer case, this is not the case when we take subsets of many finite groups. We show that if we take subsets of larger and larger finite groups uniformly at random, then not only does the probability of a set being sum-dominated tend to zero but the probability that $|A+A|=|A-A|$ tends to one, and hence a typical set is balanced in this case. The cause of this marked difference in behavior is that subsets of $\{0,..., n\}$ have a fringe, whereas finite groups do not. We end with a detailed analysis of dihedral groups, where the results are in striking contrast to what occurs for subsets of integers.