Role of social environment and social clustering in spread of opinions in co-evolving networks
Nishant Malik, Peter J. Mucha

TL;DR
This study explores how social environment and clustering influence opinion spread in co-evolving networks, revealing that opinion acceptance probabilities and initial network structure lead to diverse consensus states with complex size dependence.
Contribution
It introduces modifications to the co-evolving network voter model, incorporating asymmetric influence and local clustering preferences, and analyzes their effects on opinion dynamics.
Findings
Different opinion acceptance distributions lead to diverse final network states.
Initial clustering can induce transitions between consensus and fragmented states.
Final network structures can exhibit small-world properties.
Abstract
Taking a pragmatic approach to the processes involved in the phenomena of collective opinion formation, we investigate two specific modifications to the co-evolving network voter model of opinion formation, studied by Holme and Newman [1]. First, we replace the rewiring probability parameter by a distribution of probability of accepting or rejecting opinions between individuals, accounting for the asymmetric influences in relationships among individuals in a social group. Second, we modify the rewiring step by a path-length-based preference for rewiring that reinforces local clustering. We have investigated the influences of these modifications on the outcomes of the simulations of this model. We found that varying the shape of the distribution of probability of accepting or rejecting opinions can lead to the emergence of two qualitatively distinct final states, one having several…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
