The Rich Globular Cluster System of Abell 1689 and the Radial Dependence of the Globular Cluster Formation Efficiency
K. A. Alamo-Mart\'inez, J. P. Blakeslee, M. J. Jee, P. C\^ot\'e, L., Ferrarese, R. A. Gonz\'alez-L\'opezlira, A. Jord\'an, G. R. Meurer, E. W., Peng, M. J. West

TL;DR
This study analyzes the extensive globular cluster system in Abell 1689, revealing its large size, radial variation in formation efficiency, and comparison with total mass and stellar components, providing insights into cluster formation.
Contribution
It presents the largest GC system studied to date, with detailed radial profiles and analysis of formation efficiency variations across a massive galaxy cluster.
Findings
Total GC population estimated at 162,850 within 400 kpc.
GC mass fraction is comparable to the Milky Way's stellar mass.
GC formation efficiency varies with radius and is similar across clusters.
Abstract
We study the rich globular cluster (GC) system in the center of the massive cluster of galaxies Abell 1689 (z=0.18), one of the most powerful gravitational lenses known. With 28 HST/ACS orbits in the F814W bandpass, we reach magnitude I_814=29 with >90% completeness and sample the brightest ~5% of the GC system. Assuming the well-known Gaussian form of the GC luminosity function (GCLF), we estimate a total population of N(GC_total) = 162,850 GCs within a projected radius of 400kpc. As many as half may comprise an intracluster component. Even with the sizable uncertainties, which mainly result from the uncertain GCLF parameters, this is by far the largest GC system studied to date. The specific frequency S_N is high, but not uncommon for central galaxies in massive clusters, rising from S_N~5 near the center to ~12 at large radii. Passive galaxy fading would increase S_N by ~20% at z=0.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
