Can the 62 day X-ray period of the Ultraluminous X-ray source M82 X-1 be due to a precessing accretion disk?
Dheeraj R. Pasham (UMD), Tod E. Strohmayer (NASA/GSFC)

TL;DR
Analysis of archival data suggests the 62-day X-ray period of M82 X-1 may be caused by a precessing accretion disk rather than orbital motion, supported by spectral modulation and phase shift evidence.
Contribution
The study provides new evidence that the 62-day period is likely due to a precessing accretion disk, challenging the previous interpretation of it being the orbital period.
Findings
Spectral modulation indicates the accretion disk's flux varies with phase.
Evidence of a phase shift suggests rapid period change, consistent with disk precession.
Period change timescale estimated at approximately 10 years.
Abstract
We have analyzed all archival RXTE/PCA monitoring observations of the ultraluminous X-ray source (ULX) M82 X-1 in order to study the properties of its 62 day X-ray period (Kaaret & Feng 2007). Based on its high coherence it has been argued that the observed period is the orbital period of the binary. Utilizing a much longer data set than in previous studies we find: (1) The phase-resolved X-ray (3-15 keV) spectra -- modeled with a thermal accretion disk and a power-law -- suggest that the accretion disk's contribution to the total flux is strongly modulated with phase. (2) Suggestive evidence for a sudden phase shift--of approximately 0.4 in phase (25 days)-- between the first and the second halves of the light curve separated by roughly 1000 days. If confirmed, the implied timescale to change the period is ~ 10 yrs, which is exceptionally fast for an orbital phenomenon. These two…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
