The Contribution of Halos with Different Mass Ratios to the Overall Growth of Cluster-Sized Halos

TL;DR

This study tests the DM model by analyzing galaxy cluster growth through mergers with different halo mass ratios, using spectroscopic data from seven clusters to compare observations with simulations.

Contribution

It introduces a new observational method to quantify the contribution of mergers with various mass ratios to cluster growth, based on spectroscopic analysis of galaxy clusters.

Findings

Agreement with DM predictions for mass ratios 0.2-0.7

Underestimation of contributions at low mass ratios due to detection limits

Bias against large mass ratios in relaxed cluster samples

Abstract

We provide a new observational test for a key prediction of the \Lambda CDM cosmological model: the contributions of mergers with different halo-to-main-cluster mass ratios to cluster-sized halo growth. We perform this test by dynamically analyzing seven galaxy clusters, spanning the redshift range $0.13 < z_c < 0.45$ and caustic mass range $0.4-1.5$ $10^{15} h_{0.73}^{-1}$ M$_{\odot}$, with an average of 293 spectroscopically-confirmed bound galaxies to each cluster. The large radial coverage (a few virial radii), which covers the whole infall region, with a high number of spectroscopically identified galaxies enables this new study. For each cluster, we identify bound galaxies. Out of these galaxies, we identify infalling and accreted halos and estimate their masses and their dynamical states. Using the estimated masses, we derive the contribution of different mass ratios to cluster-sized halo growth. For mass ratios between ~0.2 and ~0.7, we find a ~1 $\sigma$ agreement with \Lambda CDM expectations based on the Millennium simulations I and II. At low mass ratios, $\lesssim 0.2$, our derived contribution is underestimated since the detection efficiency decreases at low masses, $\sim 2 \times 10^{14}$ $h_{0.73}^{-1}$ M$_{\odot}$. At large mass ratios, $\gtrsim 0.7$, we do not detect halos probably because our sample, which was chosen to be quite X-ray relaxed, is biased against large mass ratios. Therefore, at large mass ratios, the derived contribution is also underestimated.