Site effects in an alpine valley with strong velocity gradient: interest and limitations of the 'classical' BEM
Nicolas Delepine (IFPEN), Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Semblat (IFSTTAR/GERS/SV)

TL;DR
This study evaluates the effectiveness and limitations of classical Boundary Element Methods in modeling seismic site effects in a complex alpine valley with strong velocity gradients, highlighting key results and potential improvements.
Contribution
It demonstrates the capabilities and limitations of classical BEM in modeling 2D site effects in complex valleys, and discusses potential enhancements like FM-BEM.
Findings
2D models show higher fundamental frequency and amplification than 1D.
Surface waves at valley edges cause significant amplification and directivity effects.
Time domain analysis indicates ground motion can be three times larger than input for strong seismic events.
Abstract
Seismic waves may be strongly amplified in deep alluvial basins due to the velocity contrast (or velocity gradient) between the various layers as well as the basin edge effects. In this work, the seismic ground motion in a deep alpine valley (Grenoble basin, French Alps) is investigated through various 'classical' Boundary Element models. This deep valley has a peculiar geometry ("Y"-shaped) and involves a strong velocity gradient between surface geological structures. In the framework of a numerical benchmark [21-23], a representative cross section of the valley has been proposed to investigate 2D site effects through various numerical methods. The 'classical' Boundary Element Method is considered herein to model the strong velocity gradient with a 2D piecewise homogeneous medium. For a large incidence angle, the transfer functions estimated from plane SH waves are close to the one…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
