The metal-insulator transition in disordered solids: How theoretical prejudices influence its characterization. A critical review of analyses of experimental data
A. Mobius

TL;DR
This paper critically reviews how different theoretical criteria influence the interpretation of the metal-insulator transition in disordered solids, highlighting inconsistencies and emphasizing the need for improved measurements and theories.
Contribution
It provides an in-depth analysis of biases in MIT characterization methods and reinterprets experimental data, revealing common issues and the open nature of the transition's nature.
Findings
Different criteria can lead to contrasting interpretations of the MIT.
Inconsistencies in experimental data challenge the classification of the transition as discontinuous or continuous.
Measurement problems and generic features complicate understanding the MIT in disordered materials.
Abstract
In a recent experiment, Siegrist et al. [Nature Materials 10, 202 (2011)] investigated the metal-insulator transition (MIT) of GeSb_2Te_4 on increasing annealing temperature. The authors conclude that this material exhibits a discontinuous MIT with a finite minimum metallic conductivity. The striking contrast to reports on other disordered substances motivates the present in-depth study of the influence of the MIT criterion used on the characterization of the MIT. First, we discuss in detail the inherent biases of the various available approaches to locating the MIT. Second, reanalyzing the GeSb_2Te_4 measurements, we show that this material resembles other disordered solids to a large extent: according to a widely-used approach, these data may also be interpreted in terms of a continuous MIT. Checking the justification of the respective fits, however, uncovers inconsistencies in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
