Inadequacies of the Fisher Information Matrix in gravitational-wave parameter estimation
Carl L. Rodriguez, Benjamin Farr, Will M. Farr, Ilya Mandel

TL;DR
This paper compares the Fisher Information Matrix's (FIM) error estimates with Bayesian MCMC results in gravitational-wave parameter estimation, revealing significant overestimations by FIM especially for binary black hole systems.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison between FIM and MCMC methods, highlighting the limitations of FIM in practical gravitational-wave data analysis.
Findings
FIM often overestimates parameter uncertainties compared to MCMC.
Discrepancies increase with the total mass of binary black hole systems.
FIM predictions do not accurately reflect real gravitational-wave parameter estimation capabilities.
Abstract
The Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) has been the standard approximation to the accuracy of parameter estimation on gravitational-wave signals from merging compact binaries due to its ease-of-use and rapid computation time. While the theoretical failings of this method, such as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) limit on the validity of the lowest-order expansion and the difficulty of using non-Gaussian priors, are well understood, the practical effectiveness compared to a real parameter estimation technique (e.g. Markov-chain Monte Carlo) remains an open question. We present a direct comparison between the FIM error estimates and the Bayesian probability density functions produced by the parameter estimation code lalinference_mcmc. In addition to the low-SNR issues usually considered, we find that the FIM can greatly overestimate the uncertainty in parameter estimation achievable by the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
