Bimanual proprioception: are two hands better than one?
Jeremy D Wong, Elizabeth T Wilson, Dinant A Kistemaker, Paul L Gribble

TL;DR
This study investigates how the human brain combines proprioceptive information from both hands, revealing it relies on the more accurate limb rather than optimally integrating signals as Bayesian models suggest.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the nervous system preferentially uses the limb with better proprioceptive acuity for bimanual perception, challenging Bayesian optimal integration models.
Findings
Nervous system favors the more accurate limb for bimanual proprioception.
Bayesian models of optimal sensory combination do not predict observed behavior.
Humans seem to ignore less reliable limb information in bimanual proprioception.
Abstract
Information about the position of an object that is held in both hands, such as a golf club or a tennis racquet, is transmitted to the human central nervous system from peripheral sensors in both left and right arms. How does the brain combine these two sources of information? Using a robot to move participant's passive limbs, we performed psychophysical estimates of proprioceptive function for each limb independently, and again when subjects grasped the robot handle with both arms. We compared empirical estimates of bimanual proprioception to several models from the sensory integration literature: some that propose a combination of signals from the left and right arms (such as a Bayesian maximum-likelihood estimate), and some that propose using unimanual signals alone. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the nervous system both has knowledge of, and uses the limb with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
