Unifying Geometrical Representations of Gauge Theory
Scott T Alsid, Mario A Serna

TL;DR
This paper unifies three distinct geometrical representations of gauge theory, revealing their correspondence and enabling clearer separation of gauge-invariant physics from representation-dependent details.
Contribution
It provides a mapping between Kaluza-Klein, Grassmannian, and hidden metric models of gauge fields, facilitating cross-interpretation and analysis of gauge-invariant structures.
Findings
Identifies a correspondence between three geometrical approaches to gauge theory.
Provides visual examples of the geometrical relationships for $U(1)$ fields.
Discovers a hidden gauge-invariant surface underlying static electric fields.
Abstract
We unify three approaches within the vast body of gauge-theory research that have independently developed distinct representations of a geometrical surface-like structure underlying the vector-potential. The three approaches that we unify are: those who use the compactified dimensions of Kaluza-Klein theory, those who use Grassmannian models (also called gauge theory embedding or models) to represent gauge fields, and those who use a hidden spatial metric to replace the gauge fields. In this paper we identify a correspondence between the geometrical representations of the three schools.Each school was mostly independently developed, does not compete with other schools, and attempts to isolate the gauge-invariant geometrical surface-like structures that are responsible for the resulting physics. By providing a mapping between geometrical representations, we hope physicists can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
