Boundary identification of events in clinical named entity recognition
Azad Dehghan

TL;DR
This paper explores how sequence labeling models, specifically conditional random fields, combined with post-processing techniques, can improve the accuracy of boundary detection in clinical named entity recognition, which is crucial for clinical decision support.
Contribution
It demonstrates that sequence labeling and post-processing significantly enhance boundary identification accuracy in clinical event recognition.
Findings
Sequence labeling improves boundary detection accuracy.
Post-processing techniques further enhance recognition precision.
CRFs outperform previous methods in boundary identification.
Abstract
The problem of named entity recognition in the medical/clinical domain has gained increasing attention do to its vital role in a wide range of clinical decision support applications. The identification of complete and correct term span is vital for further knowledge synthesis (e.g., coding/mapping concepts thesauruses and classification standards). This paper investigates boundary adjustment by sequence labeling representations models and post-processing techniques in the problem of clinical named entity recognition (recognition of clinical events). Using current state-of-the-art sequence labeling algorithm (conditional random fields), we show experimentally that sequence labeling representation and post-processing can be significantly helpful in strict boundary identification of clinical events.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Topic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques
