Power Laws and Fragility in Flow Networks
Jesse Shore, Catherine J. Chu, Matt T. Bianchi

TL;DR
This paper investigates flow networks, revealing that their tendency toward power law degree distributions results from their structure, and that such networks are more fragile to failures than non-flow networks.
Contribution
It introduces the first random graph model for flow networks with power law degree distributions independent of rich-get-richer mechanisms.
Findings
Flow networks tend to a power law degree distribution due to their structure.
Flow networks with power law distributions are more vulnerable to catastrophic failures.
The model explains the fragility of economic and ecological networks.
Abstract
What makes economic and ecological networks so unlike other highly skewed networks in their tendency toward turbulence and collapse? Here, we explore the consequences of a defining feature of these networks: their nodes are tied together by flow. We show that flow networks tend to the power law degree distribution (PLDD) due to a self-reinforcing process involving position within the global network structure, and thus present the first random graph model for PLDDs that does not depend on a rich-get-richer function of nodal degree. We also show that in contrast to non-flow networks, PLDD flow networks are dramatically more vulnerable to catastrophic failure than non-PLDD flow networks, a finding with potential explanatory power in our age of resource- and financial-interdependence and turbulence.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques · Ecosystem dynamics and resilience · Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
