The representation type of Jacobian algebras
Christof Gei{\ss}, Daniel Labardini-Fragoso, Jan Schr\"oer

TL;DR
This paper investigates the representation type of Jacobian algebras associated with quivers, showing invariance under mutations and characterizing when they are tame, with implications for classification based on quiver mutation types.
Contribution
It establishes the invariance of the representation type of Jacobian algebras under QP-mutations and characterizes when these algebras are of tame type in relation to quiver mutation types.
Findings
Representation type is invariant under QP-mutations.
P(Q,S) is of tame type iff Q has finite mutation type.
Most finite mutation type quivers admit a unique non-degenerate potential.
Abstract
We show that the representation type of the Jacobian algebra P(Q,S) associated to a 2-acyclic quiver Q with non-degenerate potential S is invariant under QP-mutations. We prove that, apart from very few exceptions, P(Q,S) is of tame representation type if and only if Q is of finite mutation type. We also show that most quivers Q of finite mutation type admit only one non-degenerate potential up to weak right equivalence. In this case, the isomorphism class of P(Q,S) depends only on Q and not on S.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
