A comparison of the carrier density at the surface of quantum wells for different crystal orientations of silicon, gallium arsenide and indium arsenide
Ryan Hatcher, Chris Bowen

TL;DR
This study compares surface carrier densities in quantum wells made from silicon, gallium arsenide, and indium arsenide across different crystal orientations, revealing how symmetry constraints influence surface charge distribution.
Contribution
It provides a systematic analysis of how material, orientation, and well width affect carrier densities at quantum well surfaces, highlighting the role of wavefunction symmetry.
Findings
D2 states in silicon (100) wells have the lowest surface density
Carrier density shapes vary with material and orientation
Symmetry constraints influence surface charge distribution
Abstract
We report the carrier densities at the surface of single-crystal quantum wells as a function of material, orientation and well width. We include wells constructed from silicon, gallium arsenide and indium arsenide with three crystal orientations, (100), (110) and (111), included for each material. We find that the D2 states in a silicon (100) quantum well have the smallest density near the surface of the slab. Inspection of the planar average of the carrier densities reveals a characteristic shape that depends on the material and orientation, which leads to a varying degree of suppression or enhancement of the density near the surface. The physics responsible for the suppression or enhancement of the density near the surface can be traced to a constraint imposed by the symmetry of quantum well wavefunction on the phases of the bulk Bloch states of the crystal from which it can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
