Reconciling 56Ni Production in Type Ia Supernovae with Double Degenerate Scenarios
Anthony L. Piro (1), Todd A. Thompson (2), Christopher S. Kochanek (2), ((1) Caltech, (2) Ohio State University)

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different double degenerate scenarios for Type Ia supernovae can produce the observed nickel-56 yields, by comparing theoretical models with observed white dwarf populations and supernova characteristics.
Contribution
It combines observational data, models, and simulations to estimate the WD masses needed in collision and merger scenarios to match observed supernova properties.
Findings
Collisions require WD components to be around 0.75Msun, higher than typical WD masses.
Sub-Chandrasekhar detonations need WDs near 1.1Msun, similar to the average binary mass sum.
High-mass WDs are necessary for certain explosion mechanisms, implying specific progenitor evolution paths.
Abstract
Binary white dwarf (WD) coalescences driven by gravitational waves or collisions in triple systems are potential progenitors of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). We combine the distribution of 56Ni inferred from observations of SNe Ia with the results of both sub-Chandrasekhar detonation models and direct collision calculations to estimate what mass WDs should be exploding in each scenario to reproduce the observations. These WD mass distributions are then compared with the observed Galactic WD mass distribution and Monte Carlo simulations of WD-WD binary populations. For collisions, we find that the average mass of the individual components of the WD-WD binary must be peaked at ~0.75Msun, significantly higher than the average WD mass in binaries or in the field of ~0.55-0.60Msun. Thus, if collisions produce a large fraction of SNe Ia, then a mechanism must exist that favors large mass WDs.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
