Conservativity for theories of compositional truth via cut elimination
Graham E. Leigh

TL;DR
This paper proves that certain compositional axioms for truth are conservative over weak arithmetic theories using a cut elimination approach, correcting a previous error and showing significant proof size reductions.
Contribution
It introduces a cut elimination argument demonstrating conservativity of compositional truth axioms and fixes an error in prior work by Halbach.
Findings
Conservativity of compositional truth axioms established
Cut elimination leads to hyper-exponential proof size reduction
Corrects a critical error in Halbach's original proof
Abstract
We present a cut elimination argument that witnesses the conservativity of the compositional axioms for truth (without the extended induction axiom) over any theory interpreting a weak subsystem of arithmetic. In doing so we also fix a critical error in Halbach's original presentation. Our methods show that the admission of these axioms determines a hyper-exponential reduction in the size of derivations of truth-free statements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
