CLASH: Photometric redshifts with 16 HST bands in galaxy cluster fields
S. Jouvel, O. Host, O. Lahav, S. Seitz, A. Molino, D. Coe, M. Postman,, L. Moustakas, N. Ben\`itez, P. Rosati, I. Balestra, C. Grillo, L. Bradley, A., Fritz, D. Kelson, A. M. Koekemoer, D. Lemze, E. Medezinski, A. Mercurio, J., Moustakas, M. Nonino, M. Scodeggio, W. Zheng

TL;DR
This paper presents the CLASH survey's photometric redshift estimates for galaxy clusters using 16-band HST data, demonstrating high accuracy for lensing arcs and galaxies, and analyzing optimal photometry methods.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of photometric redshift accuracy in the CLASH survey, including optimal photometry techniques and validation with mock catalogues.
Findings
Achieved 3%(1+z) precision for lensing arcs
Optimal aperture size around 1" improves photo-z accuracy
Photometry with SExtractor isophotal method performs best
Abstract
The Cluster Lensing And Supernovae survey with Hubble (CLASH) is an Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Multi-Cycle Treasury program observing 25 massive galaxy clusters. CLASH observations are carried out in 16 bands from UV to NIR to derive accurate and reliable estimates of photometric redshifts. We present the CLASH photometric redshifts and study the photometric redshift accuracy of the arcs in more detail for the case of MACS1206.2-0847. We use the publicly available Le Phare and BPZ photometric redshift codes on 17 CLASH galaxy clusters. Using Le Phare code for objects with StoN>=10, we reach a precision of 3%(1+z) for the strong lensing arcs, which is reduced to 2.4%(1+z) after removing outliers. For galaxies in the cluster field the corresponding values are 4%(1+z) and 3%(1+z). Using mock galaxy catalogues, we show that 3%(1+z) precision is what one would expect from the CLASH…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
