An Age Difference of 2 Gyr between a Metal-Rich and a Metal-Poor Globular Cluster
B. M. S. Hansen (UCLA), J. S. Kalirai (STSCI), J. Anderson (STSCI), A., Dotter (ANU), H. B. Richer (UBC), R. M. Rich (UCLA), M. M. Shara (AMNH), G., G. Fahlman (NRC-H), J. R. Hurley (Swin), I. R. King (UW), D. Reitzel (UCLA),, P. B. Stetson (NRC-H)

TL;DR
This study determines the ages of two globular clusters, revealing a 2 Gyr age difference that suggests metal-rich clusters formed later than metal-poor ones, shedding light on galaxy formation history.
Contribution
It provides the first direct age comparison between a metal-rich and a metal-poor globular cluster using white dwarf populations.
Findings
47 Tucanae is approximately 9.9 Gyr old.
NGC 6397 is about 2 Gyr older than 47 Tucanae.
Metal-rich clusters formed later than metal-poor clusters.
Abstract
Globular clusters trace the formation history of the spheroidal components of both our Galaxy and others, which represent the bulk of star formation over the history of the universe. They also exhibit a range of metallicities, with metal-poor clusters dominating the stellar halo of the Galaxy, and higher metallicity clusters found within the inner Galaxy, associated with the stellar bulge, or the thick disk. Age differences between these clusters can indicate the sequence in which the components of the Galaxy formed, and in particular which clusters were formed outside the Galaxy and later swallowed along with their original host galaxies, and which were formed in situ. Here we present an age determination of the metal-rich globular cluster 47 Tucanae by fitting the properties of the cluster white dwarf population, which implies an absolute age of 9.9 (0.7) Gyr at 95% confidence. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
