Lower Limits on the Anisotropy of the Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background implied by the 2FGL and 1FHL Catalogs
Avery E. Broderick (1,2), Christoph Pfrommer (3), Ewald Puchwein (3),, Philip Chang (4), Kendrick M. Smith (1) ((1) Perimeter Institute for, Theoretical Physics, (2) University of Waterloo, (3) Heidelberg Institute for, Theoretical Studies, (4) University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limits of anisotropy in the extragalactic gamma-ray background using Fermi-LAT catalogs, revealing larger anisotropies at high energies than previously thought, which impacts models of unresolved sources.
Contribution
It provides an independent consistency check of EGRB anisotropy limits by comparing different Fermi-LAT catalogs, challenging previous assumptions about source contributions.
Findings
Evidence for larger anisotropies above 5 GeV than previously reported
Uncertainty in anisotropy limits affects constraints on high-redshift gamma-ray sources
Smooth extensions of known sources could explain both isotropic and anisotropic EGRB components
Abstract
In principle, the angular anisotropy in the extragalactic gamma-ray background (EGRB) places severe constraints upon putative populations of unresolved gamma-ray point sources. Existing estimates of the EGRB anisotropy have been constructed by excising known point sources, e.g., taken from the First or 2 Year Fermi-LAT Source Catalog (1FGL or 2FGL, respectively) and statistically analyzing the residual gamma-ray sky maps. We perform an independent check of the EGRB anisotropy limits by comparing the values obtained from the 1FGL-masked sky maps to the signal implied by sources that lie below the 1FGL detection threshold in the more sensitive 2FGL and 1FHL (First Fermi-LAT catalog of >10 GeV sources). As such, our analysis provides an internal consistency check of implications for source counts and spectral index distributions of gamma-ray bright active galactic nuclei obtained from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
