Photometric and Thermal Cross-calibration of Solar EUV Instruments
P. Boerner, P. Testa, H. Warren, M.A. Weber, C.J. Schrijver

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the calibration accuracy of solar EUV instruments, compares model predictions with observations, and proposes empirical corrections to improve the AIA response functions based on spectral data analysis.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive cross-calibration of AIA with spectral data, identifies degradation and inconsistencies in specific channels, and introduces empirical adjustments to enhance response accuracy.
Findings
AIA intensities generally agree with EVE data within 25% calibration error.
The AIA 304 Å channel shows significant degradation over time.
The 94 Å channel's spectral model underestimates plasma emission due to missing lines.
Abstract
We present an assessment of the accuracy of the calibration measurements and atomic physics models that go into calculating the SDO/AIA response as a function of wavelength and temperature. The wavelength response is tested by convolving SDO/EVE and {\it Hinode}/EIS spectral data with the AIA effective area functions and comparing the predictions with AIA observations. For most channels, the AIA intensities summed over the disk agree with the corresponding measurements derived from the current Version (V2) of the EVE data to within the estimated 25% calibration error. This agreement indicates that the AIA effective areas are generally stable in time. The AIA 304 \AA\ channel, however, does show degradation by a factor of almost 3 from May 2010 through September 2011, when the throughput apparently reached a minimum. We also find some inconsistencies in the 335 \AA\ passband, possibly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
