Evidence for exclusion of the possibility of $d$-wave superconducting-gap symmetry in Ba-doped KFe$_2$As$_2$
Y. Ota, K. Okazaki, Y. Kotani, T. Shimojima, W. Malaeb, S. Watanabe,, C. -T. Chen, K. Kihou, C. H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, T. Saito, H. Fukazawa,, Y. Kohori, S. Shin

TL;DR
This study uses laser-based angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy to analyze how Ba doping affects the superconducting gap anisotropy in KFe$_2$As$_2$, providing evidence against $d$-wave symmetry and highlighting the role of fluctuations in pairing.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Ba doping alters the superconducting gap anisotropy and rules out $d$-wave symmetry in Ba-doped KFe$_2$As$_2$, emphasizing the importance of spin and orbital fluctuations.
Findings
Superconducting gap anisotropy varies with Ba doping.
$d$-wave symmetry is excluded in Ba-doped KFe$_2$As$_2$.
Spin and orbital fluctuations are key to pairing.
Abstract
We have investigated the superconducting(SC)-gap anisotropy for several Ba-doped KFeAs samples using laser-based angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. We show that the SC-gap anisotropy and node positions drastically change with a small amount of Ba doping. Our results totally exclude a possibility of -wave symmetry and strongly suggest that both spin and orbital fluctuations are important for the paring interaction in the Ba-doped K122.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
