Candidate Type II Quasars at 2 < z < 4.3 in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III
Rachael Alexandroff, Michael A. Strauss, Jenny E. Greene, Nadia L., Zakamska, Nicholas P. Ross, W. N. Brandt, Guilin Liu, Paul S. Smith, Jian Ge,, Fred Hamann, Adam D. Myers, Patrick Petitjean, Donald P. Schneider, Hassen, Yesuf, Donald G. York

TL;DR
This paper identifies and characterizes 145 candidate Type II quasars at redshifts 2 to 4.3 from SDSS III, revealing their properties, luminosities, and polarization, and suggesting they are luminous, modestly obscured quasars with significant scattering.
Contribution
First large sample of high-redshift Type II quasar candidates from SDSS III, with detailed analysis of their spectral energy distributions and polarization.
Findings
145 candidate Type II quasars identified at 2<z<4.3
Objects show intermediate SEDs between Type I and II quasars
Detected bolometric luminosities of several times 10^46 erg/s
Abstract
At low redshifts, dust-obscured quasars often have strong yet narrow permitted lines in the rest-frame optical and ultraviolet, excited by the central active nucleus, earning the designation Type II quasars. We present a sample of 145 candidate Type II quasars at redshifts between 2 and 4.3, encompassing the epoch at which quasar activity peaked in the universe. These objects, selected from the quasar sample of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III, are characterized by weak continuum in the rest-frame ultraviolet (typical continuum magnitude of i \approx 22) and strong lines of CIV and Ly \alpha, with Full Width at Half Maximum less than 2000 kms-1. The continuum magnitudes correspond to an absolute magnitude of -23 or brighter at redshift 3, too bright to be due exclusively to the host galaxies of these objects. Roughly one third of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
