An Explanation for the Different X-ray to Optical Column Densities in the Environments of Gamma Ray Bursts: A Progenitor Embedded in a Dense Medium
Yair Krongold, J. Xavier Prochaska

TL;DR
This study explains the high X-ray to optical column density ratios in GRB afterglows by proposing a dense, pre-ionized environment around the progenitors, consistent with star-forming regions.
Contribution
It introduces time-evolving photoionization models showing that dense, pre-ionized clouds around GRB progenitors explain observed column density ratios, unlike homogeneous models.
Findings
Dense, pre-ionized clouds account for high X-ray to optical ratios.
Homogeneous models predict similar X-ray and optical columns, inconsistent with observations.
Cloud properties align with giant molecular clouds in star-forming regions.
Abstract
We study the > 10 ratios in the X-ray to optical column densities inferred from afterglow spectra of Gamma Ray Bursts due to gas surrounding their progenitors. We present time-evolving photoionization calculations for these afterglows and explore different conditions for their environment. We find that homogenous models of the environment (constant density) predict X-ray columns similar to those found in the optical spectra, with the bulk of the opacity being produced by neutral material at large distances from the burst. This result is independent of gas density or metallicity. Only models assuming a progenitor immersed in a dense (10^(2-4) cm-3) cloud of gas (with radius ~10 pc), with a strong, declining gradient of density for the surrounding interstellar medium are able to account for the large X-ray to optical column density ratios. However, to avoid an unphysical correlation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
