TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that adding pivoting to the ZX-calculus does not derive from existing axioms and introduces an angle-free version that is complete for real stabilizer quantum mechanics.
Contribution
It shows the limitations of pivoting within the ZX-calculus and introduces a new angle-free calculus that achieves completeness for real stabilizers.
Findings
Pivoting cannot be derived from ZX-calculus axioms.
Pivoting does not imply local complementation.
Angle-free ZX-calculus is complete for real stabilizer quantum mechanics.
Abstract
We show that pivoting property of graph states cannot be derived from the axioms of the ZX-calculus, and that pivoting does not imply local complementation of graph states. Therefore the ZX-calculus augmented with pivoting is strictly weaker than the calculus augmented with the Euler decomposition of the Hadamard gate. We derive an angle-free version of the ZX-calculus and show that it is complete for real stabilizer quantum mechanics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
