Statistical significance of rising and oscillatory trends in global ocean and land temperature in the past 160 years

TL;DR

This study assesses the statistical significance of linear and oscillatory trends in 160 years of global temperature data, highlighting the land record's potential for detecting climate change signals.

Contribution

It introduces a novel scheme for testing multi-parameter trend models against complex null hypotheses in climate data analysis.

Findings

Linear trends are statistically significant across datasets.

Oscillatory trends are generally insignificant but become significant with Bayesian refinement.

Land temperature records may be more sensitive for detecting warming signals.

Abstract

Various interpretations of the notion of a trend in the context of global warming are discussed, contrasting the difference between viewing a trend as the deterministic response to an external forcing and viewing it as a slow variation which can be separated from the background spectral continuum of long-range persistent climate noise. The emphasis in this paper is on the latter notion, and a general scheme is presented for testing a multi-parameter trend model against a null hypothesis which models the observed climate record as an autocorrelated noise. The scheme is employed to the instrumental global sea-surface temperature record and the global land-temperature record. A trend model comprising a linear plus an oscillatory trend with period of approximately 60 yr, and the statistical significance of the trends, are tested against three different null models: first-order autoregressive process, fractional Gaussian noise, and fractional Brownian motion. The linear trend is significant in all cases, but the oscillatory trend is insignificant for ocean data and barely significant for land data. By means of a Bayesian iteration, however, using the significance of the linear trend to formulate a sharper null hypothesis, the oscillatory trend in the land record appears to be statistically significant. The results suggest that the global land record may be better suited for detection of the global warming signal than the ocean record.