The Impact of Different Physical Processes on the Statistics of Lyman-limit and Damped Lyman-alpha Absorbers
Gabriel Altay, Tom Theuns, Joop Schaye, C. M. Booth, Claudio Dalla, Vecchia

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological simulations to analyze how various physical processes influence the distribution of neutral hydrogen absorbers at high redshift, finding robustness in LLS predictions despite physical uncertainties.
Contribution
It systematically investigates the impact of multiple physical processes on the neutral hydrogen column density distribution using advanced simulations with radiative transfer corrections.
Findings
f(NHI) in the LLS regime is robust to physical process variations
Variations in f(NHI) increase at higher column densities
Self-regulated star formation explains the stability of LLS statistics
Abstract
We compute the z = 3 neutral hydrogen column density distribution function f(NHI) for 19 simulations drawn from the OWLS project using a post-processing correction for self-shielding calculated with full radiative transfer of the ionising background radiation. We investigate how different physical processes and parameters affect the abundance of Lyman-limit systems (LLSs) and damped Lyman-alpha absorbers (DLAs) including: i) metal-line cooling; ii) the efficiency of feedback from SNe and AGN; iii) the effective equation of state for the ISM; iv) cosmological parameters; v) the assumed star formation law and; vi) the timing of hydrogen reionization . We find that the normalisation and slope, D = d log10 f /d log10 NHI, of f(NHI) in the LLS regime are robust to changes in these physical processes. Among physically plausible models, f(NHI) varies by less than 0.2 dex and D varies by less…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
