A Census of Quasar-Intrinsic Absorption in the Hubble Space Telescope Archive: Systems from High Resolution Echelle Spectra
Rajib Ganguly, Ryan S. Lynch, Jane C. Charlton, Michael Eracleous,, Todd M. Tripp, Christopher Palma, Kenneth R. Sembach, Toru Misawa, Joseph R., Masiero, Nikola Milutinovic, Benjamin D. Lackey, Therese M. Jones

TL;DR
This study catalogs intrinsic quasar absorption systems at low redshift using Hubble Space Telescope spectra, confirming certain ion-specific properties and analyzing their proximity to quasars.
Contribution
It provides a detailed census of low-redshift intrinsic quasar absorption lines, comparing ion-specific selection effectiveness and proximity effects.
Findings
N V systems are most likely intrinsic based on partial coverage.
C IV and O VI are less effective at indicating intrinsic systems.
There is an excess of absorbers near quasar redshift within 5000 km/s.
Abstract
We present a census of z(abs) < 2, intrinsic (those showing partial coverage) and associated [z(abs) ~ z(em)] quasar absorption-line systems detected in the Hubble Space Telescope archive of Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph echelle spectra. This work complements the Misawa et al. (2007) survey of 2 < z(em) < 4 quasars that selects systems using similar techniques. We confirm the existence of so-called "strong N V" intrinsic systems (where the equivalent width of H I Ly alpha is small compared to N V 1238) presented in that work, but find no convincing cases of "strong C IV" intrinsic systems at low redshift/luminosity. Moreover, we also report on the existence of "strong O VI" systems. From a comparison of partial coverage results as a function of ion, we conclude that systems selected by the N V ion have the highest probability of being intrinsic. By contrast, the C IV and O VI…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
