Groups of Highly Cited Publications: Stability in Content with Citation Window Length
Nadine Rons

TL;DR
This paper examines how the content of highly cited publication groups remains stable or changes as the citation window length increases, considering factors like domain and citation timing.
Contribution
It investigates the stability of highly cited publication groups' content with varying citation window lengths, addressing a gap in evaluative bibliometrics.
Findings
Content stability varies with citation window length.
Highly cited groups show size stability after three years.
Citation peaks can occur later, affecting content stability.
Abstract
The growing focus in research policy worldwide on top scientists makes it increasingly important to define adequate supporting measures to help identify excellent scientists. Highly cited publications have since long been associated to research excellence. At the same time, the analysis of the high-end of citation distributions still is a challenging topic in evaluative bibliometrics. Evaluations typically require indicators that generate sufficiently stable results when applied to recent publication records of limited size. Highly cited publications have been identified using two techniques in particular: pre-set percentiles, and the parameter free Characteristic Scores and Scales (CSS) (Gl\"anzel & Schubert, 1988). The stability required in assessments of relatively small publication records, concerns size as well as content of groups of highly cited publications. Influencing factors…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research · Web visibility and informetrics · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
