WZ Sge-type dwarf novae with multiple rebrightenings: MASTER OT J211258.65+242145.4 and MASTER OT J203749.39+552210.3
Chikako Nakata, Tomohito Ohshima, Taichi Kato, Daisaku Nogami,, Gianluca Masi, Enrique de Miguel, Joseph Ulowetz, Colin Littlefield, William, N. Goff, Thomas Krajci, Hiroyuki Maehara, William Stein, Richard Sabo, Ryo, Noguchi, Rikako Ono, Miho Kawabata, Hisami Furukawa

TL;DR
This study investigates WZ Sge-type dwarf novae with multiple rebrightenings, analyzing their superhump periods and mass ratios, and proposes a new evolutionary perspective linking these systems to SU UMa-type dwarf novae.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new method using stage A superhump periods to estimate mass ratios, challenging previous assumptions about period bouncers.
Findings
Superhump periods are longer in systems with multiple rebrightenings.
Stage A superhump periods suggest higher mass ratios than previously inferred.
WZ Sge-type dwarf novae with rebrightenings are on the same evolutionary track as SU UMa-type dwarf novae.
Abstract
We report on photometric observations of WZ Sge-type dwarf novae, MASTER OT J211258.65+242145.4 and MASTER OT J203749.39+552210.3 which underwent outbursts in 2012. Early superhumps were recorded in both systems. During superoutburst plateau, ordinary superhumps with a period of 0.060291(4) d (MASTER J211258) and of 0.061307(9) d (MASTER J203749) in average were observed. MASTER J211258 and MASTER J203749 exhibited eight and more than four post-superoutburst rebrightenings, respectively. In the final part of the superoutburst, an increase in the superhump periods was seen in both systems. We have made a survey of WZ Sge-type dwarf novae with multiple rebrightenings, and confirmed that the superhump periods of WZ Sge-type dwarf novae with multiple rebrightenings were longer than those of WZ Sge-type dwarf novae without a rebrightening. Although WZ Sge-type dwarf novae with multiple…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
