On Axiomatization of Inconsistency Indicators for Pairwise Comparisons
W.W. Koczkodaj, R. Szwarc

TL;DR
This paper critically examines inconsistency measures in pairwise comparisons, proposing an axiomatic framework independent of specific methods, and demonstrates the invalidity of the eigenvalue-based inconsistency measure used in AHP.
Contribution
It introduces an axiomatization for inconsistency indicators that does not depend on particular approximation methods, challenging the validity of the eigenvalue-based inconsistency measure.
Findings
Eigenvalue-based inconsistency measure is proven incorrect.
Axiomatization of inconsistency indicators is proposed.
Framework is independent of specific comparison methods.
Abstract
We examine the notion of inconsistency in pairwise comparisons and propose an axiomatization which is independent of any method of approximation or the inconsistency indicator definition (e.g., Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP). It has been proven that the eigenvalue-based inconsistency (proposed as a part of AHP) is incorrect.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
