An inequality on global alliances for trees
Alexandria Yu

TL;DR
This paper establishes a new inequality relating the sizes of minimum global defensive and offensive alliances in trees, addressing an open question in the field of graph theory.
Contribution
It proves an inequality connecting the minimum sizes of global defensive and offensive alliances in trees, providing a theoretical advancement in alliance theory.
Findings
Proves an inequality between alliance sizes in trees
Answers an open question in alliance theory
Advances understanding of dominating sets in graphs
Abstract
In this paper, we prove an inequality on the cardinalities of the minimum size global defensive alliance and the minimum size global offensive alliance. A global defensive alliance is a dominating set such that when any point inside a selected group is chosen, at least half of the points in its neighborhood are also in the set , including the selected point. A global offensive alliance is a dominating set such that if any point outside is selected, at least half of the points in its neighborhood, including the selected point, are in set . Our result answers an open question in [HA].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
