First Determination of the Weak Charge of the Proton
Qweak Collaboration: D. Androic, D. S. Armstrong, A. Asaturyan, T., Averett, J. Balewski, J. Beaufait, R. S. Beminiwattha, J. Benesch, F., Benmokhtar, J. Birchall, R. D. Carlini, G. D. Cates, J. C. Cornejo, S., Covrig, M. M. Dalton, C. A. Davis, W. Deconinck, J. Diefenbach

TL;DR
This paper reports the first measurement of the proton's weak charge using parity-violating electron scattering, achieving unprecedented precision and confirming Standard Model predictions.
Contribution
It presents the first determination of the proton's weak charge by combining low Q^2 PVES data with higher Q^2 data, improving constraints on weak charges.
Findings
Measured asymmetry Aep = -279 +- 35 (stat) +- 31 (sys) ppb
Determined proton weak charge QpW = 0.064 +- 0.012 in agreement with Standard Model
Constrained neutron's weak charge to QnW = -0.975 +- 0.010
Abstract
The Qweak experiment has measured the parity-violating asymmetry in polarized e-p elastic scattering at Q^2 = 0.025(GeV/c)^2, employing 145 microamps of 89% longitudinally polarized electrons on a 34.4cm long liquid hydrogen target at Jefferson Lab. The results of the experiment's commissioning run are reported here, constituting approximately 4% of the data collected in the experiment. From these initial results the measured asymmetry is Aep = -279 +- 35 (statistics) +- 31 (systematics) ppb, which is the smallest and most precise asymmetry ever measured in polarized e-p scattering. The small Q^2 of this experiment has made possible the first determination of the weak charge of the proton, QpW, by incorporating earlier parity-violating electron scattering (PVES) data at higher Q^2 to constrain hadronic corrections. The value of QpW obtained in this way is QpW(PVES) = 0.064 +- 0.012, in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
