Guidelines for the design of evolve and resequencing studies
Robert Kofler, Christian Schl\"otterer

TL;DR
This paper evaluates optimal experimental designs for evolve and resequencing studies using simulations, highlighting key factors like population size, replication, and linkage disequilibrium to maximize detection of adaptive mutations.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive simulation-based framework to optimize design parameters for E&R studies, improving detection power for adaptive loci.
Findings
Low linkage disequilibrium enhances detection accuracy.
Replication is more crucial than population size.
Beneficial loci with s=0.005 can be identified at the nucleotide level.
Abstract
Standing genetic variation provides a rich reservoir of potentially useful mutations facilitating the adaptation to novel environments. Experimental evolution studies have demonstrated that rapid and strong phenotypic responses to selection can also be obtained in the laboratory. When combined with the Next Generation Sequencing technology, these experiments promise to identify the individual loci contributing to adaption. Nevertheless, until now, very little is known about the design of such evolve and resequencing (E&R) studies. Here, we use forward simulations of entire genomes to evaluate different experimental designs that aim to maximize the power to detect selected variants. We show that low linkage disequilibrium in the starting population, population size, duration of the experiment and the number of replicates are the key factors in determining the power and accuracy of E&R…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics · Genetic diversity and population structure · Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
